Comments on: S’PARK: $100 million mixed-use project for Boulder
http://denverurbanreview.com/2016/01/3820/
Denver Urban Review is your source for Denver development news, featuring project announcements, construction updates, and real estate information.Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:48:23 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8By: Justin
http://denverurbanreview.com/2016/01/3820/#comment-5280
Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:33:48 +0000http://denverurbanreview.com/?p=3820#comment-5280Hi Rob, I appreciate the support!
]]>By: Rob C
http://denverurbanreview.com/2016/01/3820/#comment-5276
Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:02:42 +0000http://denverurbanreview.com/?p=3820#comment-5276Wow what a baseless attack. Keep up the good work Justin!
]]>By: Justin
http://denverurbanreview.com/2016/01/3820/#comment-5172
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 04:28:17 +0000http://denverurbanreview.com/?p=3820#comment-5172Hi Nik, From the information I have been provided, a GC has not been named.
]]>By: Nik
http://denverurbanreview.com/2016/01/3820/#comment-5170
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:02:54 +0000http://denverurbanreview.com/?p=3820#comment-5170Do you know yet who the GC is going to be?
]]>By: Justin
http://denverurbanreview.com/2016/01/3820/#comment-5169
Wed, 20 Jan 2016 23:10:35 +0000http://denverurbanreview.com/?p=3820#comment-5169Hi Ryan, The intention of the article was to share a few renderings and give a brief overview of the development and mention the members of the development team. The article was not intended to provide a comprehensive overview of this project’s position in the transportation landscape of Boulder. I am no way, nor do I have any motivation to be negligent or willfully ignorant in covering projects as you mentioned in your comment. The template for my articles is to provide the basic facts: square footage, number units, construction timeline, project renderings, mention members of the development team and so forth. My articles average around 300 words. Not trying to irritate anyone by not mentioning Boulder Junction Station and B Line expansion. Are you involved in the S’PARK development or just a reader that would like to see more information about how specific developments fit into the context of their community’s transportation fabric?
]]>By: Ryan
http://denverurbanreview.com/2016/01/3820/#comment-5163
Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:51:18 +0000http://denverurbanreview.com/?p=3820#comment-5163I’m a little surprised by the omission of SPARK’s immediate proximity to the recently opened Boulder Junction at Depot Square Station and the future B Line expansion. Much more than just a project “consistent with Boulder’s commitment to… transportation initiatives,” SPARK could and should be seen as a Transportation Oriented Development (TOD) related to RTD’s ongoing and planned FasTracks expansions. Even Sopher Sparn Architects, describing their design, claim that SPARK is a “a true mixed use and transit-oriented place for Boulder Junction.” I have a hard time entertaining the possibility that this was anything but purposeful negligence or willful ignorance.
]]>